Report compares legislative tracking services

A new report released earlier this week compares two British Columbia legislative tracking services, QP LegalEze and Quickscribe.

Published by Crosby Group Consulting and commissioned by Stem Legal Web Enterprises Inc. the paper aims “to provide an objective comparison between Quickscribe and QP LegalEze”.

The report is titled Quickscribe: A Comparison and Evaluation Report. It found that Quickscribe has several advantages over QP LegalEze, including:

  • faster system updates than QP LegalEze;
  • more competitive pricing;
  • easier navigation for users;
  • superior ‘alert’ technology for updates;
  • more accessible customer assistance;

Download the full report (39 pgs) at:
http://www.crosbygroup.ca/pdf/whitepaperquickscribe.pdf

An executive summary (12 pgs) is available at:
http://www.crosbygroup.ca/pdf/executivesummaryquickscribe.pdf

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 28th, 2008 at 7:44 am and is filed under Legal Research. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Report compares legislative tracking services”

  1. Connie Crosby Says:
    June 28, 2008 at 10:47 am | Reply

    Hi Rob:

    Thanks so much for having a look at the report. I welcome any feedback you or your readers have.

    Cheers,
    Connie

Leave a Reply